Contact us

Article

Anesthesiologists in the cath lab are exposed to more radiation than in the operating room

A study of anesthesia fellows recorded under 10 mrem a month in the operating rooms and 20 to 180 mrem a month in the cath lab, and a review explains why the position is hard to shield.

An anesthesiologist in the cath lab usually works at the head of the table, beside the patient, for the whole case. Two studies measured what that position receives, and a review explains why it is hard to shield.

The cath lab against the operating room

Henderson and colleagues gave radiation badges to the anesthesia fellows at a pediatric hospital. In the operating rooms their monthly readings stayed below 10 mrem, the lowest dose the badges record. In the cath lab they ranged from 20 to 180 mrem a month, and often exceeded the guidelines for workers who are not radiation workers.1 The authors recommended badging anesthesiologists who work often in fluoroscopy areas such as the cath lab.

Beside the anesthesia machine

Mohapatra and colleagues measured staff doses with real-time dosimeters in 39 fenestrated endovascular aortic repairs, in an operating room rather than a cath lab. The dosimeter on the anesthesia equipment recorded the highest doses in the room: 143 µSv more per case than the average operator (range 38 to 247). The authors put it down to ineffective shielding at that position.2

Why the position is hard to protect

A 2020 review by Biso and Vidovich gives the reasons. Anesthesiologists often need direct contact with the patient during the procedure, they stay in a relatively fixed position, and the room rarely lets them keep a safe distance from the source. Their place on the patient’s left, the review adds, may expose them to more radiation than interventional cardiologists on the right.3

Shielding the head of the table

In a phantom study of EggNest® Complete, scatter at the anesthesia or jugular access position was 85% lower than with standard cath lab shielding, averaged over five C-arm angulations. The study was sponsored by Egg Medical, and its authors note the results need confirming in clinical studies.4 See the study on the Evidence page.

Sources

  1. Henderson KH, Lu JK, Strauss KJ, Treves ST, Rockoff MA. Radiation exposure of anesthesiologists. J Clin Anesth. 1994;6(1):37-41. doi:10.1016/0952-8180(94)90116-3
  2. Mohapatra A, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM, Eagleton MJ, Thornsberry B. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(3):702-709. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.02.032
  3. Biso SMR, Vidovich MI. Radiation protection in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12(4):1648-1655. doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.12.86
  4. Riley RF, Kamen J, Tao A, Gomez-Cardona D. Comparative effectiveness of the EggNest Complete shielding system to standard shielding in the cath lab. Am Heart J Plus. 2025;54:100543. Site reference 14. doi:10.1016/j.ahjo.2025.100543

More from the EggBlog

Other articles.

  • 14 April 2025

    Torrance Memorial installs EggNest Protect in its cath lab

    Torrance Memorial Medical Center installed EggNest Protect in its cardiac catheterization lab, paid for by a charitable donation, and says it is the first hospital in California to do so.

    Read the article
  • 14 September 2023

    Patient BMI and physician radiation dose in coronary angiography

    In 1,119 coronary angiograms, physicians received 7.0 times the radiation dose when the patient's BMI was 40 or more than when it was under 25.

    Read the article
  • 6 July 2023

    Interventional echocardiographers receive higher radiation doses than interventional cardiologists

    In 60 structural heart procedures, the interventional echocardiographer's median dose per case was 10.6 µSv against the interventional cardiologist's 2.1 µSv, and a second study found the highest exposure at the waist and lower body.

    Read the article

See every article

Want to see what EggNest can do for your lab?